| Michael Loßin on Fri, 15 Dec 2000 10:11:01 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: Form feed problems |
Frank Shute schrieb: > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 09:45:35AM +0100, Michael Loßin wrote: > > Frank Shute wrote: > > > > > > My setup: > > > > > > RH linux 6.2 > > > GS_VERSION=6.50 (driver used: ljet3) > > ^^^^ > > This is brand new, so expect some bugs in there (6.01 was a quick fix > > for 6.0 as well). > > I was using GNU Ghostscript 5.50 so I thought I'd give 6.50 a try, > nothing ventured nothing gained etc. > > > > > apsfilter-5.4.2 > > > Epson EPL-5200 > > > > > > I've used this printer OK before under linux but with a different > > > setup, but now with the above I'm having little joy. > > > > > > If I send it some postscript from dvips everything looks to work fine > > > according to the log but the `feed' button on the printer lights up > > > and stays on. It's not getting a form feed at the end thinks I so I > > > add RAW_EPILOGUE!\014! to: > > > > As the name says, this variable only works for _raw_ printouts; DVI > > files (and the resulting PS output) are printed via print_data (which > > does not use the raw sequences). > > I should have guessed that. > > > Are PostScript files ejected properly? If not, you may want to enable > > the form feed on the lpd daemon level: just delete the :sf: entry in > > /etc/printcap. > > No they're not ejected properly. There's no :sf: entry in printcap but > I've tried the line: > > :ff:\f\ > > in printcap but with no joy. Shouldn't that be :ff=\f or something? Anyway, if you use LPRng there's also an :ff_separator: option, maybe that helps. Michael